Collins v. Dotson
Charles Edward Collins |
Charles Dotson |
2:2019cv00013 |
January 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 DEFENDANT'S SECOND AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND JURY DEMAND by Charles Dotson.(Iglesias, David) |
NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference RESET for 4/4/2019 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga, ) |
Filing 6 DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND JURY DEMAND by Charles Dotson.(Iglesias, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, PROPOSED DEADLINES FOR DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND DISCOVERY ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2019 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/21/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Charles Edward Collins (Maness, Josh) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Charles Dotson.(Iglesias, David) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Charles Dotson. (ch, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charles Dotson ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7096252.), filed by Charles Edward Collins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maness, Josh) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Collins v. Dotson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Charles Dotson | |
Represented By: | David R. Herring Iglesias |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Edward Collins | |
Represented By: | Josh Blackshear Maness |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.