GREE, INC. v. SUPERCELL OY
GREE, INC. |
SUPERCELL OY |
2:2019cv00200 |
May 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER re #16 Order on Motion for Leave to File, #26 Response to Non-Motion, filed by SUPERCELL OY. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/25/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting #17 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 7/24/2019. (ch, ) |
***FILED IN ERROR. ORDERS ARE NOT FILED SEPARATELY ON THE DOCKET IT IS AN ATTACHMENT Document # 28, Addional attachment. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
Filing 28 ***FILED IN ERROR***Additional Attachments to Main Document: #27 Response in Opposition to Motion,.. (Sacksteder, Michael) Modified on 7/23/2019 (ch, ). |
Filing 27 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by SUPERCELL OY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael J. Sacksteder in Support of Defendant's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Its Third Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1)(Sacksteder, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/23/2019: #3 Text of Proposed Order) (ch, ). |
Filing 26 RESPONSE to #16 Order on Motion for Leave to File [Defendant's Objection to the Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint] filed by SUPERCELL OY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael J. Sacksteder in Support of Defendant's Objection to Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1)(Sacksteder, Michael) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for SUPERCELL OY to 8/28/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 25 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re SUPERCELL OY.( Miller, Geoffrey) |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher L. Larson on behalf of SUPERCELL OY (Larson, Christopher) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jessica Andrea Martinez Kaempf on behalf of SUPERCELL OY (Kaempf, Jessica) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Geoffrey Robert Miller on behalf of SUPERCELL OY (Miller, Geoffrey) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bryan Alexander Kohm on behalf of SUPERCELL OY (Kohm, Bryan) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael J Sacksteder on behalf of SUPERCELL OY (Sacksteder, Michael) |
Filing 19 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against SUPERCELL OY, filed by GREE, INC..(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 17 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by GREE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/27/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/25/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 14 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint against SUPERCELL OY, filed by GREE, INC..(Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 12 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by GREE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 11 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against SUPERCELL OY, filed by GREE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Steven David Moore on behalf of GREE, INC. (Moore, Steven) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to SUPERCELL OY. (nkl, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Taylor Jacqueline Pfingst on behalf of GREE, INC. (Pfingst, Taylor) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Norris Power Boothe on behalf of GREE, INC. (Boothe, Norris) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William Edward Mosley on behalf of GREE, INC. (Mosley, William) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Scott Edward Kolassa on behalf of GREE, INC. (Kolassa, Scott) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (klc, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (klc, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by GREE, INC. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SUPERCELL OY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7283588.), filed by GREE, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.