Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
| Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv00225 |
| June 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cisco Systems, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cisco Systems, Inc. to 8/19/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Jury Trial Demanded, Report on Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding Patent or Trademark served on Cisco Systems on June 12, 2019, filed by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (De Mory, Denise) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Cisco Systems, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cisco Systems, Inc. to 8/2/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (DeRieux, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Capshaw, Sidney) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Corey A Johanningmeier on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Johanningmeier, Corey) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Henry Charles Bunsow on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Bunsow, Henry) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Denise M De Mory on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (De Mory, Denise) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (De Mory, Denise) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Cisco Systems, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (De Mory, Denise) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Tel Aviv University Economic Corporation Ltd., Corporate Parent Tel Aviv University for Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (De Mory, Denise) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7307264.), filed by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (U.S. Pat. 10,270,535), #2 Exhibit B (U.S. Pat. 10,033,465), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons(es))(De Mory, Denise) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
