Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff: Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv00225
Filed: June 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Elizabeth L DeRieux on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (DeRieux, Elizabeth)
June 12, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Capshaw, Sidney)
June 12, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Corey A Johanningmeier on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Johanningmeier, Corey)
June 12, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Henry Charles Bunsow on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (Bunsow, Henry)
June 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Denise M De Mory on behalf of Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. (De Mory, Denise)
June 12, 2019 Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (De Mory, Denise)
June 12, 2019 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Cisco Systems, Inc.. (ch, )
June 12, 2019 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (De Mory, Denise)
June 12, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
June 12, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
June 12, 2019 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Tel Aviv University Economic Corporation Ltd., Corporate Parent Tel Aviv University for Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (De Mory, Denise)
June 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Cisco Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7307264.), filed by Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (U.S. Pat. 10,270,535), #2 Exhibit B (U.S. Pat. 10,033,465), #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons(es))(De Mory, Denise)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
Represented By: Corey A Johanningmeier
Represented By: Henry Charles Bunsow
Represented By: Denise M De Mory
Represented By: Sidney Calvin Capshaw, III
Represented By: Elizabeth L DeRieux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?