Sonohm Licensing LLC v. Fry's Electronics, Inc.
Sonohm Licensing LLC |
Fry's Electronics, Inc. |
2:2019cv00297 |
August 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Fry's Electronics, Inc.(Lamkin, Rachael) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Fry's Electronics, Inc. to 11/12/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
|
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Fry's Electronics, Inc.(Lamkin, Rachael) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Fry's Electronics, Inc. to 10/28/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. Fry's Electronics, Inc. served on 9/5/2019, answer due 9/26/2019. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Fry's Electronics, Inc.. (nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC (Bennett, David) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bennett, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Fry's Electronics, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7416361.), filed by Sonohm Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 6,651,207, #3 Exhibit B - Resp to Office Action during Pros. History of U.S. Patent No. 6,651,207, #4 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 7,106,705, #5 Exhibit D - Resp to Office Action during Pros. History of U.S. Patent No. 7,106,705)(Bennett, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sonohm Licensing LLC v. Fry's Electronics, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Sonohm Licensing LLC | |
Represented By: | David R Bennett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Fry's Electronics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Rachael Dauphine Lamkin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.