Kutt v. Apple Inc et al
Mers Kutt |
Google Corporation, Storage Post Inc, Seasons Condominiums, Pamela Mary Devins, Dell Inc, Robert Greene, Hewlet Packard Company, International Business Machines Corporation, Amazon.com Inc, Blackberry LTD, Best Buy Co Inc, ASUSTeK Computer Inc, Banking & Trust Company, United States of America Governments, Sony Corporation, Scotiabank, Toshiba Corporation, Mr. Stuart Smith LLP, Lenovo Group Limited, Carol Clay, Rhea Greene, Nokia Corporation, Sprint Corp, AT&T Corp., Ellen Azevedo, Acer Incorporated, Verizon Communications Inc., Condominium Association, Fujitu Limited, Samsung Electronics Company Ltd, Travelers Companies Inc, Atmel Corporation, Intel Corporation, HTC Corporation, JP Morgan Chase & Co., T-Mobile USA Inc, Arm Holding PLC, Microsoft Corporation, nVidia Corporation, Edward Francis O'Connor, LLP, Apple Inc, eBay Inc, Jones Day, Qualcomm Incorporated and Advanced Micro Devices |
2:2019cv00316 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Robert W Schroeder |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Decl. of Ana Williams, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Tiffany Patrice Cunningham on behalf of Intel Corporation (Cunningham, Tiffany) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Apple Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Decl. of N. Pous, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(4), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) by AT&T Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Paula Phillips, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Breedlove, Scott) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Against Arm by Arm Holding PLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A Plaintiff Mailing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kevin) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendant BlackBerry Ltd.'s Motion to Dismiss Under Fed. Civ. P. 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5)) by Blackberry LTD. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Geng, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Hassett, Shaun) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Travelers Companies Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Case No. 1:12-cv-1489 (E.D. Va. dismissed Feb. 20, 2013)), #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Walker, Matthew) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Dean Walker on behalf of Travelers Companies Inc (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Walker, Matthew) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and Memorandum in Support by Jones Day. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2013.02.20 E.D. Va. Order, #2 Exhibit 2-2015.12.17 E.D. Va. Order, #3 Exhibit 3-2017.01.24 E.D. Va. Order, #4 Exhibit 4-2016.02.05 U.S. Ct. App. Fed. Cir. Order, #5 Exhibit 5-S. Suchy Decl., #6 Exhibit 6-Kutt Sent Priority Mail Env (Exhibit A S. Suchy Decl., #7 Exhibit 7-Kutt Sent Complaint and Attachments (Exhibit B S. Suchy Decl., #8 Text of Proposed Order)(Erdmann, Michael) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Apple Inc deadline is 11/18/2019, Intel Corporation deadline is 11/18/2019. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/18/2019. (ch, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint Under FRCP 12(B)(4) and 12(B)(5) by Verizon Communications Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aizawa, #2 Ex 1 - Postal Package, #3 Ex 2 - Kutt Complaint, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) |
Answer Due Deadline Updated for Apple Inc to 11/18/2019; Intel Corporation to 11/18/2019. (ch, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Intel Corporation re #4 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to Pro Se Plaintiff's Complaint (Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Apple Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Per Conversation with Mr. Mers Kutt on 10/17/2019, an alternate e-mail address was provided to the court: mk@merskutt.com (klc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Expedite Briefing. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 10/16/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 5 Opposed MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Intel Corporation's Opposed Motion to Extend the Deadline to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 4 Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move, or Otherwise Respond to Pro Se Plaintiff's Complaint by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Gillam, Harry) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap recused. Case reassigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III for all further proceedings. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/10/2019. (nkl, ) |
Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope(s))(nkl, ) |
Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 6-49203. (mjc, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Mers Kutt. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 US Patent, #3 US Patent, #4 Exhibit)(ch, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/20/2019: #5 Envelope(s)) (ch, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/30/2019: #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (nkl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.