Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC v. Suntrust Bank
| Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC |
| Suntrust Bank |
| 2:2019cv00340 |
| October 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Suntrust Bank.( Gillam, Harry) |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Suntrust Bank to 12/22/2019. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Suntrust Bank to 12/7/2019. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Suntrust Bank.( Dietrich, Blake) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC. Suntrust Bank served on 10/17/2019, answer due 11/7/2019. (Hansley, Austin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Suntrust Bank C/O: Corporation Service Company. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC. (Hansley, Austin) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hansley, Austin) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC (Hansley, Austin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Suntrust Bank ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7478405.), filed by Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Hansley, Austin) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC v. Suntrust Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Suntrust Bank | |
| Represented By: | Harry Lee Gillam, Jr |
| Represented By: | Blake Thomas Dietrich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lighthouse Consulting Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Austin Lee Hansley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
