Blitzsafe Texas LLC v. General Motors Company
Plaintiff: Blitzsafe Texas LLC
Defendant: General Motors Company and General Motors LLC
Case Number: 2:2019cv00377
Filed: November 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDERS that Blitzsafes claims against General Motors Company in the above-captioned case against are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court further ORDERS that General Motors, LLC is hereby JOINED as a Defendant in the above- captioned case. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/28/2020. (ch, )
December 19, 2019 Filing 14 ***FILED IN ERROR***NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Mark Mann on behalf of General Motors Company (Mann, James) Modified on 12/19/2019 (ch, ).
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:19-cv-00378. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/18/2019. (nkl, )
December 19, 2019 ***FILED IN ERROR. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED PLEASE FILE IN LEAD CASE Document # 14, NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
December 3, 2019 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Blitzsafe Texas LLC. General Motors Company served on 11/22/2019, answer due 1/13/2020. (Fabricant, Alfred)
November 27, 2019 Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company.( Maroulis, Victoria)
November 27, 2019 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for General Motors Company to 1/13/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
November 22, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Daniel James Shea, Jr on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Shea, Daniel)
November 22, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alessandra Carcaterra Messing on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Messing, Alessandra)
November 22, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Michael Mercadante on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Mercadante, Joseph)
November 22, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Rubino, Vincent)
November 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter)
November 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of Blitzsafe Texas LLC (Fabricant, Alfred)
November 22, 2019 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Blitzsafe Texas LLC identifying Corporate Parent None for Blitzsafe Texas LLC. (Baxter, Samuel)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to General Motors Company. (ch, )
November 20, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Baxter, Samuel)
November 15, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against General Motors Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7528671.), filed by Blitzsafe Texas LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Baxter, Samuel)
November 15, 2019 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
November 15, 2019 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blitzsafe Texas LLC v. General Motors Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Company
Represented By: Victoria Fishman Maroulis
Represented By: James Mark Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: James Mark Mann
Represented By: Gregory Blake Thompson
Represented By: Marissa Rachel Ducca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Blitzsafe Texas LLC
Represented By: Samuel Franklin Baxter
Represented By: Joseph Michael Mercadante
Represented By: Alfred Ross Fabricant
Represented By: Peter Lambrianakos
Represented By: Daniel James Shea, Jr
Represented By: Alessandra Carcaterra Messing
Represented By: Vincent J Rubino, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?