SIMO Holdings, Inc. et al v. Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited et al
| SIMO Holdings, Inc., Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd. and Skyroam, Inc. |
| Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited, Shenzhen uCloudlink New Technology Co. Ltd. and Shenzhen uCloudlink Network Technology Co. Ltd. |
| 2:2020cv00003 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Benjamin E Weed on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Weed, Benjamin) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Benjamin E Weed on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7640565. (Weed, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Gina A. Johnson on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7636076. (Johnson, Gina) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Farris Matariyeh on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7635990. (Matariyeh, Farris) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Peter E. Soskin on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7635964. (Soskin, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jeffrey C. Johnson on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7635905. (Johnson, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 8 REDACTION to #2 Sealed Patent Document by SIMO Holdings, Inc., Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd., Skyroam, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited, Shenzhen uCloudlink Network Technology Co. Ltd., Shenzhen uCloudlink New Technology Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| Filing 6 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #2 Sealed Patent Document.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Authorization to File Under Seal)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number TXE100019895 (mrp, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by SIMO Holdings, Inc., Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd., Skyroam, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by SIMO Holdings, Inc., Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd., Skyroam, Inc. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 2 SEALED PATENT DOCUMENT COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Seal Document Complaint by SIMO Holdings, Inc., Shenzhen Skyroam Technology Co., Ltd., Skyroam, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
