Ouhrabka v. Exeltis USA, Inc. et al
| Janice Ouhrabka |
| Marc Beardslee and Exeltis USA, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00023 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Joint MOTION to Change Venue For Intradistrict Transfer (Stipulated and Agreed). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/16/2020. (ch, )
|
| Intradistrict Transfer to Sherman Division new case number is 4:20-cv-215 RWS. (ch, ) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Change Venue For Intradistrict Transfer (Stipulated and Agreed) by Marc Beardslee, Exeltis USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedman, Robert) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Exeltis USA, Inc. (Friedman, Robert) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Marc Beardslee, Exeltis USA, Inc..(Friedman, Robert) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Jay Marshall Wallace terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 3/8/2020. (ch, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Marc Beardslee, Exeltis USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedman, Robert) |
| Filing 5 ***DEFICIENT DOCUMENT*** MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Marc Beardslee, Exeltis USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Friedman, Robert) Modified on 3/4/2020 (ch, ). |
| NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the 5 submitted NO CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE. Correction should be made by one business day (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Marc Beardslee.( Wallace, Jay) |
| Filing 3 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Exeltis USA, Inc..( Wallace, Jay) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Marc Beardslee to 3/13/2020. 16 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Exeltis USA, Inc. to 3/13/2020. 17 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Marc Beardslee, Exeltis USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7641637.), filed by Janice Ouhrabka. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons(es) Summons-Exeltis, #3 Summons(es) Summons-Beardslee)(Goodman, Robert) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
