NavBlazer, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America
Plaintiff: NavBlazer, LLC
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Case Number: 2:2020cv00072
Filed: March 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order by NavBlazer, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Garteiser, Randall)
May 1, 2020 NOTICE of Hearing: TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference RESET for 5/18/2020 11:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. ***The Court's telephone conference number is 877-336-1839. The Access Code is 5737419#. Participants should use a landline phone connection, unless use of a cellular connection is the only viable means available. Participants shall mute themselves upon joining the conference and stay muted unless speaking. Further participants shall identify themselves each and every time they speak.***(jml)
April 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/18/2020 01:30 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/17/2020. (nkl, )
April 7, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Randall T Garteiser on behalf of NavBlazer, LLC (Garteiser, Randall)
March 25, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Nicholas J Whilt on behalf of Hyundai Motor America. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-7724993. (Whilt, Nicholas)
March 25, 2020 Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Hyundai Motor America.( Yagura, Ryan)
March 25, 2020 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Hyundai Motor America to 5/12/2020. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
March 24, 2020 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Hyundai Motor America.( Yagura, Ryan)
March 24, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Raymond William Mort, III on behalf of NavBlazer, LLC (Mort, Raymond)
March 24, 2020 ***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 6, Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, )
March 24, 2020 FILED IN ERROR Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Hyundai Motor America to 4/6/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) Modified on 3/24/2020 (nkl, ).
March 24, 2020 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Hyundai Motor America to 4/27/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
March 23, 2020 Filing 6 FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Hyundai Motor America.( Yagura, Ryan) Modified on 3/24/2020 (nkl, ).
March 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan K Yagura on behalf of Hyundai Motor America (Yagura, Ryan)
March 17, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, )
March 5, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Hyundai Motor America and Hyundai Motor America (Registered Agent) (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, )
March 5, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
March 5, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
March 4, 2020 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fasone, Thomas)
March 4, 2020 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by NavBlazer, LLC (Fasone, Thomas)
March 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hyundai Motor America ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7694126.), filed by NavBlazer, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Elantra 2016 marketing materials, #3 Exhibit B - Car Multimedia System User's Manual)(Fasone, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NavBlazer, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NavBlazer, LLC
Represented By: Thomas Guy Fasone, III
Represented By: Raymond William Mort, III
Represented By: Randall T Garteiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hyundai Motor America
Represented By: Nicholas J Whilt
Represented By: Ryan K Yagura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?