East Texas Canopy, Inc v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.
| East Texas Canopy, Inc |
| Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. |
| 2:2020cv00110 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. (Sadler, Martin) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Original Answer and Defenses to Plaintiff's Original Complaint ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd..(Sadler, Martin) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by East Texas Canopy, Inc. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. served on 4/20/2020, answer due 5/11/2020. (Boyd, Paul) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. by and through its registered agent for service, CT Corporation Systems. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7751437.), filed by East Texas Canopy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover, #2 Summons(es) summons)(Boyd, Paul) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: East Texas Canopy, Inc v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Martin Robert Sadler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: East Texas Canopy, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Paul M Boyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
