Tabboula v. The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company
| Layla Tabboula and Layla Lovins |
| The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company |
| 2:2020cv00264 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE the Scheduling Conference set for October 13, 2020 at 11:00 am is CANCELLED. (bga, ) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 10/13/2020 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (bga, ) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company.(Mathisen, Eric) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/22/2020. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Change Venue and Brief in Support by The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mathisen, Eric) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2020: #2 Revised Propsed Order) (nkl, ). |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company.( Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 5 FILED IN ERROR Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mathisen, Eric) Modified on 8/31/2020 (nkl, ). |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Hartford Life, Inc., Corporate Parent Hartford Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. for The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company. (Mathisen, Eric) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric P Mathisen on behalf of The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company (Mathisen, Eric) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR - was filed using the wrong docket event. Document # 5, Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company to 9/28/2020. 26 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company By and Through Its Registered Agent CT Corporation System. (nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7941156.), filed by Layla Tabboula. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goodman, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
