Japan Display Inc. v. Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd.
Japan Display Inc. |
Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd. |
2:2020cv00284 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw #9 Summons Returned Executed and Substitute Attached Waiver of Service Form by Japan Display Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) Waiver of Service of Summons, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Klein, Eric) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Japan Display Inc.. Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd. served on 9/3/2020, answer due 9/24/2020. (Klein, Eric) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd.. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Erik Chiles Shallman on behalf of Japan Display Inc. (Shallman, Erik) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey R. Swigart on behalf of Japan Display Inc. (Swigart, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Hilary Preston on behalf of Japan Display Inc. (Preston, Hilary) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Japan Display Inc. (Klein, Eric) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Japan Display Inc.. (Klein, Eric) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Klein, Eric) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7976685.), filed by Japan Display Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 9,310,654 B2, #2 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Patent No. 8,830,409 B2, #3 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 9,817,288 B2, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Klein, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Japan Display Inc. v. Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Japan Display Inc. | |
Represented By: | Erik Chiles Shallman |
Represented By: | Hilary Preston |
Represented By: | Jeffrey R. Swigart |
Represented By: | Eric Joseph Klein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tianma Microelectronics Co. Ltd. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.