Liberty Patents, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
Plaintiff: Liberty Patents, LLC
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America
Case Number: 2:2020cv00291
Filed: September 2, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2020 Filing 15 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Liberty Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah)
October 26, 2020 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Panasonic Corporation of North America to 11/17/2020. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
October 2, 2020 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )
September 18, 2020 Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Liberty Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah)
September 18, 2020 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Panasonic Corporation of North America to 11/2/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
September 18, 2020 ***FILED IN ERROR. PER ATTORNEY Document # 13, Unopposed Application for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
September 18, 2020 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Panasonic Corporation of North America to 10/12/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) Modified on 9/18/2020 (ch, ).
September 17, 2020 Filing 13 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Liberty Patents, LLC.(Harrington, Zachariah) Modified on 9/18/2020 (ch, ).
September 17, 2020 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Liberty Patents, LLC. Panasonic Corporation of North America served on 9/10/2020, answer due 10/1/2020. (Harrington, Zachariah)
September 9, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew J Antonelli on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Antonelli, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Larry Dean Thompson, Jr on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Thompson, Larry)
September 9, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rehan Mohammed Safiullah on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Safiullah, Rehan)
September 9, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Ryan Pinckney on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Pinckney, Christopher)
September 9, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE by Liberty Patents, LLC of Related Cases (Harrington, Zachariah)
September 9, 2020 Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Panasonic Corporation of North America. (ch, )
September 9, 2020 Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Liberty Patents, LLC (Harrington, Zachariah)
September 7, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stafford Grigsby Helm Davis on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Davis, Stafford)
September 7, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Catherine Susan Bartles on behalf of Liberty Patents, LLC (Bartles, Catherine)
September 2, 2020 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Harrington, Zachariah)
September 2, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Panasonic Corporation of North America ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7980985.), filed by Liberty Patents, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harrington, Zachariah)
September 2, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
September 2, 2020 Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Patents, LLC v. Panasonic Corporation of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Patents, LLC
Represented By: Zachariah Harrington
Represented By: Matthew J Antonelli
Represented By: Christopher Ryan Pinckney
Represented By: Rehan Mohammed Safiullah
Represented By: Catherine Susan Bartles
Represented By: Larry Dean Thompson, Jr
Represented By: Stafford Grigsby Helm Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?