U.S. Silica Company v. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG
| U.S. Silica Company |
| Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG |
| 2:2020cv00298 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
Joint MOTION for Protective Order by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreed Protective Order)(Whitley, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 30
Joint MOTION for Entry of Agreed Discovery Order by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreed Discovery Order)(Whitley, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 29
Joint MOTION for Entry of Agreed Docket Control Order by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Agreed Docket Control Order, #2 Exhibit B - Agreed Docket Control Order)(Whitley, Matthew)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference held on 5/12/2021. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court then gave the parties Markman and Jury Selection dates. (Court Reporter Shawn McRoberts, RMR, CRR.) (aeb)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2021 09:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/19/2021. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 27
REPLY to Response to Motion re #25 MOTION to Dismiss AKW's Counterclaims filed by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Dickson, Cecilia)
|
|
Filing 26
RESPONSE in Opposition re #25 MOTION to Dismiss AKW's Counterclaims filed by Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Bernstein, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 25
MOTION to Dismiss AKW's Counterclaims by U.S. Silica Company. (Whitley, Matthew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/27/2021: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER granting #21 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/25/2021. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #20 Motion to Withdraw Counsel. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/22/2021. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 22
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bilma Canales on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Canales, Bilma)
|
|
Filing 21
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Whitley, Matthew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/22/2021: #2 Revised Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
|
|
Filing 20
Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Richardson, Michael) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/19/2021: #2 Revised Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to AKWs Counterclaims. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/22/2020. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by U.S. Silica Company (Whitley, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 17
FILED IN ERROR Additional Attachments to Main Document: #16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, .. (Whitley, Matthew) Modified on 12/18/2020 (nkl, ).
|
|
Filing 16
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #10 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, by U.S. Silica Company. (Whitley, Matthew) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/18/2020: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
|
|
***FILED IN ERROR - a proposed order should not be filed on the docket as a separate entry. Document # 17,. Additional Attachments to Main Document. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Evan S. Day on behalf of Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8157016. (Day, Evan)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jennifer Parker Ainsworth on behalf of Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG (Ainsworth, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Janice Le Ta on behalf of Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG (Ta, Janice)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick John McKeever on behalf of Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG (McKeever, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 11
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG (Bernstein, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 10
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Answer, Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against U.S. Silica Company by Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 303 Patent - Sexauer Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 - US8865303, #3 Exhibit 3 - US9303407, #4 Exhibit 4 - US9714512, #5 Exhibit 5 - US10145115, #6 Exhibit 6 - US10253493, #7 Exhibit 7 - US10724245)(Bernstein, Matthew)
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
|
|
Filing 9
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by U.S. Silica Company. Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG waiver sent on 12/8/2020, answer due 2/6/2021. (Redmon, James)
|
|
Filing 8
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by U.S. Silica Company identifying Corporate Parent U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc. for U.S. Silica Company. (Redmon, James)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cecilia R Dickson on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Dickson, Cecilia)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Anthony W Brooks on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Brooks, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kent E Baldauf, Jr on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Baldauf, Kent)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Redmon, James)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Ernest Richardson on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Richardson, Michael)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Patrick Redmon on behalf of U.S. Silica Company (Redmon, James)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Amberger Kaolinwerke Eduard Kick GmbH & Co. KG ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7989770.), filed by U.S. Silica Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whitley, Matthew)
|
|
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, )
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
