Crispin v. Mac Transportation, LLC
Plaintiff: Zachary Scott Crispin
Defendant: Mac Transportation, LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv00300
Filed: September 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Unopposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/16/2020. (ch, )
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, PROPOSED DEADLINES FOR DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND DISCOVERY ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 11/13/2020 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/15/2020. (nkl, ) Modified on 10/16/2020 (nkl, ).
October 14, 2020 Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Motion to Stay by Mac Transportation, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, Kimberly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2020: #2 Revised Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
October 8, 2020 Filing 3 Defendant's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mac Transportation, LLC.(Moore, Kimberly)
October 8, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
September 9, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Mac Transportation, LLC. (ch, )
September 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mac Transportation, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-7991560.), filed by Zachary Scott Crispin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hommel, William)
September 9, 2020 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
September 9, 2020 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crispin v. Mac Transportation, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mac Transportation, LLC
Represented By: Kimberly Sumner Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zachary Scott Crispin
Represented By: William S Hommel, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?