Universal Arbor LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
| Universal Arbor LLC |
| Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00308 |
| September 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay and Notice of Settlement. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/10/2020. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Stay and Notice of Settlement by Universal Arbor LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Universal Arbor LLC.( Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. to 11/9/2020. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Universal Arbor LLC. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. served on 9/18/2020, answer due 10/9/2020. (Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service Company. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Universal Arbor LLC identifying Corporate Parent Endpoint IP LLC for Universal Arbor LLC. (Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0540-8005675.), filed by Universal Arbor LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Rastegar, Jonathan) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Universal Arbor LLC v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Universal Arbor LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Hart Rastegar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
