Aperture Net LLC v. Grandstream Networks, Inc.
| Aperture Net LLC |
| Grandstream Networks, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00394 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint or Otherwise Respond by Grandstream Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Guaragna, John) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 3/12/2021 09:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 2/9/2021. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Grandstream Networks, Inc..( Guaragna, John) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Grandstream Networks, Inc. to 2/24/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Grandstream Networks, Inc. c/o Xiang Wei. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Aperture Net LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of Aperture Net LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Grandstream Networks, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8165063.), filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aperture Net LLC v. Grandstream Networks, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aperture Net LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Grandstream Networks, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John M Guaragna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
