Alley v. Eastman Chemical Company
Steven Thomas Alley |
Eastman Chemical Company |
2:2020cv00395 |
December 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Steven Thomas Alley. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Albritton, Eric) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Steven Thomas Alley (Latchford, Shawn) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Eastman Chemical Company (De Leon, Lara) |
Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Eastman Chemical Company.(De Leon, Lara) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Thomas Alley. Eastman Chemical Company served on 12/24/2020, answer due 1/14/2021. (Latchford, Shawn) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Eastman Chemical Company. (ch, ) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shawn A. Latchford on behalf of Steven Thomas Alley (Latchford, Shawn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eastman Chemical Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8165412.), filed by Steven Thomas Alley.(Albritton, Eric) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alley v. Eastman Chemical Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven Thomas Alley | |
Represented By: | Shawn A. Latchford |
Represented By: | Eric M. Albritton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Eastman Chemical Company | |
Represented By: | Lara Cardin De Leon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.