Gree, Inc. v. Supercell Oy et al
GREE, INC |
SUPERCELL OY |
Andrew Sheppard |
2:2020mc00013 |
October 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw ; denying as moot #1 MOTION to Quash. Court directs the Clerk to CLOSE the above-captioned matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/1/2020. (ch, ) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw #1 MOTION to Quash by Andrew Sheppard. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/4/2020. (ch, ) |
Filing 5 REPLY to Response to Motion re #1 filed by GREE, INC. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 1:20-mc-01041. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Non-Party Andrew Sheppard's MOTION to Quash and Accompanying MOTION to Transfer. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Transfer is GRANTED and Non-Party Andrew Sheppard's Motion to Quash is HEREBY TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. Signed by Judge Andrew W. Austin. (jv2) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Motions No Longer Referred: #1 MOTION to Quash and Motion to Transfer. (jv2) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Filing 2 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Supercell Oy, re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Movant Andrew Sheppard [Defendant Supercell Oy's Response to Non-Party Andrew Sheppard's Motion to Quash and Accompanying Motion to Transfer] (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sacksteder, Michael) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Text Order REFERRING #1 Motion to Quash entered by Judge Robert Pitman. IT IS ORDERED that Andrew Sheppard's motion to quash, (Dkt. 1), is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Andrew W. Austin for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Rule 1(c) of Appendix C of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (sh) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
MOTION REFERRED: referred #1 MOTION to Quash. Referral Judge: Andrew W. Austin. (jv2) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash ($47.00 Filing Fee #100039189) by Andrew Sheppard. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kasey E. Koballa, #2 Declaration of Andrew Sheppard, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Civil Cover Sheet and Receipt, #12 Proposed Order)(cj) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Case assigned to Judge Robert Pitman. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (cj) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
If ordered by the court, all referrals and consents in this case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Austin (cj) [Transferred from Texas Western on 10/27/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.