AGIS Software Development LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
AGIS Software Development LLC |
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile US, Inc. |
WhatsApp, Inc., Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber and Lyft, Inc. |
2:2021cv00072 |
March 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Richard G Frenkel on behalf of WhatsApp, Inc. (Frenkel, Richard) |
Filing 37 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Lisa K Nguyen on behalf of WhatsApp, Inc. (Nguyen, Lisa) |
Filing 36 ORDER granting #23 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for AGIS to Comply with P. R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions) and for Defendants to Comply with P. R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions). Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/28/2021. (ch, ) |
Filing 35 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by WhatsApp, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Facebook, Inc. for WhatsApp, Inc.. (Jones, Michael) |
Filing 34 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue [to Dkt 1, Complaint in 2:21cv29] by WhatsApp, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Tarranty County Record 1, #2 Exhibit B - Tarranty County Record 2, #3 Exhibit C - Tarrant County Record 3, #4 Exhibit D - Plat Survey, #5 Exhibit E - Tarrant Appraisal Dist Property Search, #6 Exhibit F - Tax Information, #7 Exhibit G - Denton County Tax Info, #8 AGIS Davis Declaration ISO Facebook Motion to Dismiss, #9 Exhibit 1 - Land Plat Survey, #10 Exhibit 2 - Geren Article, #11 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Miguel Jose Bombach on behalf of T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Bombach, Miguel) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 31 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Lyft, Inc. (Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 30 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Text of Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Deron R Dacus on behalf of Lyft, Inc. (Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 28 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Bethany R Salpietra on behalf of Lyft, Inc. (Salpietra, Bethany) |
Filing 27 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeremy John Taylor on behalf of Lyft, Inc. (Taylor, Jeremy) |
Filing 26 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Reiter, Mark) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Standing Issue by Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Declaration of Ashbey N. Morgan, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Text of Proposed Order)(Reiter, Mark) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss by Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Declaration of Ashbey N. Morgan, #2 Affidavit /Declaration of Jeff Rapipong, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Reiter, Mark) |
Filing 23 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for AGIS to Comply with P. R. 3-1 & 3-2 (Infringement Contentions) and for Defendants to Comply with P. R. 3-3 & 3-4 (Invalidity Contentions) by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Jassiem N Moore on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8376747. (Moore, Jassiem) |
Filing 21 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc..( McBrayer, Ryan) |
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 5/11/2021; T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 5/11/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justine Minseon Park on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Park, Justine) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ashbey N Morgan on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Morgan, Ashbey) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Robert Curtis on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Curtis, Nathan) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Anthony Vincent on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Vincent, Robert) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark Nolan Reiter on behalf of Uber Technologies Inc. d/b/a Uber (Reiter, Mark) |
Filing 15 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2021 09:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/19/2021. (nkl, ) |
Filing 14 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned case is hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:21-cv-00072. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/16/2021. (nkl, ) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Deutsche Telekom Holding B.V. for T-Mobile US, Inc.; Corporate Parent T-Mobile US Inc for T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (McBrayer, Ryan) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 4/26/2021; T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 4/26/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc..( McBrayer, Ryan) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AGIS Software Development LLC. T-Mobile US, Inc. served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AGIS Software Development LLC. T-Mobile USA, Inc. served on 3/4/2021, answer due 3/25/2021. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Enrique William Iturralde on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Iturralde, Enrique) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of AGIS Software Development LLC (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AGIS Software Development LLC identifying Corporate Parent AGIS Holdings, Inc. for AGIS Software Development LLC. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8275173.), filed by AGIS Software Development LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fabricant, Alfred) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.