CXT Systems, Inc. v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
| CXT Systems, Inc. |
| The Sherwin-Williams Company |
| 2:2021cv00092 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference held on 5/12/2021. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court then gave the parties Markman and Jury Selection dates. (Court Reporter Shawn McRoberts, RMR, CRR) (aeb) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by The Sherwin-Williams Company (McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against CXT Systems, Inc. by The Sherwin-Williams Company.(McNabnay, Neil) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE by CXT Systems, Inc. of Compliance with service of their P.R. 3-1 and P.R. 3-2 Disclosures (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sarika Naresh Patel on behalf of The Sherwin-Williams Company (Patel, Sarika) |
Filing 12
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2021 09:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/16/2021. (ch, )
|
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for The Sherwin-Williams Company to 5/10/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re The Sherwin-Williams Company.( McNabnay, Neil) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by CXT Systems, Inc.. The Sherwin-Williams Company served on 3/19/2021, answer due 4/9/2021. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Kurt Truelove on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Truelove, Justin) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued as to The Sherwin-Williams Company. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jacob Daniel Ostling on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Ostling, Jacob) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of CXT Systems, Inc. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by CXT Systems, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Quest Patent Research Corporation for CXT Systems, Inc.. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against The Sherwin-Williams Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8301785.), filed by CXT Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - U.S. Patent No. 7,016,875, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Patent No. 7,257,581, #3 Exhibit C - U.S. Patent No. 8,260,806, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
