MOBILE EQUITY CORP. v. WALMART INC.
| MOBILE EQUITY CORP. |
| WALMART INC. |
| 2:2021cv00126 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kathryn Riley Grasso on behalf of WALMART INC. (Grasso, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Kathryn Riley Grasso on behalf of WALMART INC.. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8431824. (Grasso, Kathryn)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian Foster Chessman on behalf of WALMART INC. (Chessman, Christian)
|
|
Filing 9
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re WALMART INC. (Findlay, Eric)
|
|
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for WALMART INC. to 6/16/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, )
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
|
|
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for WALMART INC. to 6/1/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
|
|
Filing 8
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re MOBILE EQUITY CORP..( Davis, William)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by MOBILE EQUITY CORP.. WALMART INC. served on 4/9/2021, answer due 4/30/2021. (Davis, William)
|
|
Filing 6
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by MOBILE EQUITY CORP. (Davis, William)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Rudolph Fink, IV on behalf of MOBILE EQUITY CORP. (Fink, Rudolph)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian J Hurt on behalf of MOBILE EQUITY CORP. (Hurt, Christian)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Davis, William)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued as to WALMART INC.. (ch, )
|
|
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
|
|
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against WALMART INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8344247.), filed by MOBILE EQUITY CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
