PacSec3, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
| PacSec3, LLC |
| Juniper Networks, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00228 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT - Case transferred from Texas Eastern has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:21-cv-07812, filed 10/06/2021.. (ch, ) |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of California. (ch, ) |
Filing 8
TRANSFER ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/4/2021. (nkl, )
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Juniper Networks, Inc. (Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Change Venue TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Megan Whyman Olesek on behalf of Juniper Networks, Inc. (Olesek, Megan) |
| Filing 4 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Juniper Networks, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Juniper Networks, Inc. to 11/3/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Juniper Networks, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ramey, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Juniper Networks, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8467364.), filed by PacSec3, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit US6789190, #2 Exhibit US7047564, #3 Exhibit US7523497, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PacSec3, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PacSec3, LLC | |
| Represented By: | William P Ramey, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Juniper Networks, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Megan Whyman Olesek |
| Represented By: | Melissa Richards Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
