Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC |
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Denso Corporation and Denso International America, Inc. |
General Motors Company, General Motors LLC, Aptiv PLC, Hyundai Motor Company, Hyundai Motor America, Genesis Motor America LLC and Hyundai Capital America |
2:2021cv00281 |
July 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Melissa Richards Smith on behalf of Genesis Motor America LLC, Hyundai Capital America, Hyundai Motor America, Hyundai Motor Company (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 25 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by General Motors Company, General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Walker, Chad) |
Filing 24 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Routh, Steven) |
Filing 23 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company, General Motors LLC.( Walker, Chad) |
Filing 22 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company, General Motors LLC.( Walker, Chad) Modified on 9/13/2021 (ch, ). |
***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 22, UNOPPOSED APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Aptiv PLC to 11/15/2021. 17 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for General Motors LLC to 10/1/2021; General Motors Company to 10/1/2021. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 21 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Aptiv PLC.( Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew D. Satchwell on behalf of Aptiv PLC (Satchwell, Matthew) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Richard Steadman on behalf of Aptiv PLC (Steadman, Paul) |
Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Infringement and Invalidity Contentions by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Aptiv PLC waiver sent on 8/30/2021, answer due 10/29/2021. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 16 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 9/29/2021 02:00 PM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/26/2021. (ch, ) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, and Waiver of Foreign Service. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/26/2021. (ch, ) |
Filing 14 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - above-captioned case is hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:21-cv-00281. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/24/2021. (ch, ) |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, and Waiver of Foreign Service by Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Routh, Steven) |
Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Denso International America, Inc..( Routh, Steven) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Denso International America, Inc. to 9/16/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 11 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..(Chen, Kelly) |
***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. to 8/26/2021; Toyota Motor North America, Inc. to 8/26/2021; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. to 8/26/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) Modified on 8/6/2021 (ch, ). |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. to 9/16/2021; Toyota Motor North America, Inc. to 9/16/2021; Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. to 9/16/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
***FILED IN ERROR. PER ATTORNEY Document # 10, Unopposed Application for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
Filing 10 ***FILED IN ERROR***Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..( Chen, Kelly) Modified on 8/6/2021 (ch, ). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Denso International America, Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Hong Annita Zhong on behalf of Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8515488. (Zhong, Hong) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Denso Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es), #2 Summons(es), #3 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bunt, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND against Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8509274.), filed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O)(Bunt, Robert) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.