Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. General Motors Company et al
Plaintiff: Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
Defendant: General Motors Company, General Motors LLC and Aptiv PLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00282
Filed: July 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - above-captioned case is hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:21-cv-00281. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 8/24/2021. (ch, )
August 16, 2021 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re General Motors Company, General Motors LLC.( Walker, Chad)
August 16, 2021 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for General Motors LLC to 9/16/2021; General Motors Company to 9/16/2021. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. General Motors LLC served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert)
August 2, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. General Motors Company served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Bunt, Robert)
July 30, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Hong Annita Zhong on behalf of Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8515519. (Zhong, Hong)
July 26, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to General Motors Company, General Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, )
July 26, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC (Bunt, Robert)
July 26, 2021 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Bunt, Robert)
July 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND JURY DEMAND against Aptiv PLC, General Motors Company, General Motors LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8509429.), filed by Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27, #29 Exhibit 28, #30 Exhibit 29, #31 Exhibit 30, #32 Exhibit 31, #33 Exhibit 32, #34 Exhibit 33, #35 Exhibit 34, #36 Exhibit 35, #37 Exhibit 36, #38 Exhibit 37, #39 Exhibit 38, #40 Exhibit 39, #41 Exhibit 40, #42 Exhibit 41.a, #43 Exhibit 41.b, #44 Exhibit 42, #45 Exhibit 43, #46 Exhibit 44, #47 Exhibit 45, #48 Exhibit 46, #49 Exhibit 47, #50 Exhibit 48, #51 Exhibit 49, #52 Exhibit 50, #53 Exhibit 51, #54 Exhibit 52, #55 Exhibit 53, #56 Exhibit 54, #57 Exhibit 55, #58 Exhibit 56, #59 Exhibit 57, #60 Exhibit 58)(Bunt, Robert)
July 26, 2021 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
July 26, 2021 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. General Motors Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC
Represented By: Robert Christopher Bunt
Represented By: Hong Annita Zhong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors Company
Represented By: Chad Brian Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Represented By: Chad Brian Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aptiv PLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?