Collision Communications, Inc. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al
Collision Communications, Inc. |
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson Inc. |
2:2021cv00327 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned case is hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:21-cv-00308. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/25/2021. (nkl, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Ericsson Inc. answer due 11/22/2021; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson answer due 11/22/2021.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/24/21. (ch, ) |
Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Move, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stevenson, Theodore) |
Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons in a Civil Action, Complaint for Patent Infringement with Jury Trial Demanded, Civil Cover Sheet, and Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement served on Ericsson Inc. on 09/01/2021, filed by Collision Communications, Inc.. (Batchelder, James) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Issued as to Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Shong Yin on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Yin, Shong) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Steven Pepe on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Pepe, Steven) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Samuel Lawrence Brenner on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Brenner, Samuel) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Matthew Richard Shapiro on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Shapiro, Matthew) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin John Post on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Post, Kevin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jolene L. Wang on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Wang, Jolene) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James Francis Mack on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Mack, James) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by James R Batchelder on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Batchelder, James) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alexander Ernest Middleton on behalf of Collision Communications, Inc. (Middleton, Alexander) |
Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Collision Communications, Inc.. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Collision Communications, Inc. (Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8557735.), filed by Collision Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.