Rogers et al v. Hanley et al
| James L. Rogers, Jr., Sheila E. Pryor and Tiffany L. Rogers |
| Sheldon Hanley and Stand-by Trucking |
| Randy Akin |
| 2:2021cv00343 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/26/2021. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 8
DOCKET CONTROL ORDER - Pretrial Conference set for 6/21/2022 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne., Amended Pleadings due by 5/2/2022., Discovery due by 4/7/2022., Jury Selection set for 7/11/2022 09:00AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap., Mediation Completion due by 4/28/2022., Motions due by 6/9/2022., Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/16/2022.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/26/2021. (ch, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediator Randy Akin, 3400 W. Marshall Ave., Suite 300, Longview, TX 75604, telephone number 903-500-7444, is hereby appointed as mediator. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 10/26/2021. (ch, )
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 10/22/2021 in chambers with no recording. David Hagan present for plaintiffs. Ashley Vega present for defendants. Proposed deadlines for Docket Control Order and Discovery Order discussed. Standard protective order requested. Randy Akin appointed as Mediator. (bga) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Ashley N Vega on behalf of All Defendants. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number 0540-8633511. (Vega, Ashley) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2021 04:10 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/28/2021. (ch, )
|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 Defendants' Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Sheldon Hanley, Stand-by Trucking.(Brennig, Charles) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to Sheldon Hanley, Stand-by Trucking. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8561769.), filed by James L. Rogers, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hagan, David) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
