Langford v. Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc.
| Amanda L. Langford |
| Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00431 |
| November 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting in part #9 Notice of Settlement. Deadlines stayed 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/11/22. (ch, )
|
| NOTICE the Scheduling Conference set for 2/3/22 is CANCELLED. (bga) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement by Amanda L. Langford (Volheim, Nathan) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 2/3/2022 01:50 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 1/4/2022. (ch, )
|
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. (Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc..(Martin, Eugene) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amanda L. Langford. Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. served on 12/13/2021, answer due 1/3/2022. (Volheim, Nathan) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eric Donald Coleman on behalf of Amanda L. Langford (Coleman, Eric) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Charles Volheim on behalf of Amanda L. Langford (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8688048.), filed by Amanda L. Langford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Volheim, Nathan) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Langford v. Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda L. Langford | |
| Represented By: | Eric Donald Coleman |
| Represented By: | Nathan Charles Volheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Synerprise Consulting Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Xerxes Martin, IV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
