Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
| Estech Systems IP, LLC |
| Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv00475 |
| December 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. (St. Clair, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 11 Liberty Mutual Group Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM in Response against Estech Systems IP, LLC by Liberty Mutual Group, Inc..(St. Clair, Nathaniel) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Basil Trent Webb on behalf of Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. (Webb, Basil) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Liberty Mutual Group, Inc..( Morehan, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David Wynne Morehan on behalf of Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. (Morehan, David) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. to 2/28/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Todd Eric Landis on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Landis, Todd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Wittenzellner on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Wittenzellner, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Simons on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Simons, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Estech Systems, Inc. for Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Williams, Fred) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Williams, Fred) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8727597.), filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Fred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
