Estech Systems IP, LLC v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC et al
| Estech Systems IP, LLC |
| 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC and 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00006 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc., 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC (Laquer, Alan) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc., 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.(Laquer, Alan) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC to 2/28/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. to 2/28/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 9, Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (nkl, ) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc..( Dacus, Deron) |
| Filing 9 FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc..( Dacus, Deron) Modified on 1/28/2022 (nkl, ). |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.( Dacus, Deron) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Todd Eric Landis on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Landis, Todd) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Wittenzellner on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Wittenzellner, John) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Simons on behalf of Estech Systems IP, LLC (Simons, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to 99 Cents Only Stores Texas, Inc. CT Corporation System, 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC CT Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) 99 CENTS ONLY STORES, LLC)(nkl, ) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Estech Systems, Inc. for Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Williams, Fred) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Williams, Fred) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8732452.), filed by Estech Systems IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Williams, Fred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
