TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. EL POLLO LOCO, INC. et al
| EL POLLO LOCO, INC. and EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC. |
| TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
| 2:2022cv00045 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC. identifying Corporate Parent El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. for EL POLLO LOCO, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC.. (Cunningham, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. by EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC..(Cunningham, Thomas) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC. to 4/6/2022; EL POLLO LOCO, INC. to 4/6/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC..( Heartfield, J) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC. served on 2/14/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. EL POLLO LOCO, INC. served on 2/14/2022, answer due 3/7/2022. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian J Hurt on behalf of TIARE TECHNOLOGY (Hurt, Christian) Modified on 2/16/2022 (ch, ). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC., EL POLLO LOCO, INC. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8782135.), filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - '729 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - '414 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - '224 Patent, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/10/2022: #5 Civil Cover Sheet CORRECTED) (ch, ). |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
