Sprayberry v. Anderson et al
Plaintiff: Mancel Sprayberry
Defendant: Roger W Anderson and Darah Lyn Eckert
Case Number: 2:2022cv00116
Filed: April 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Roger W Anderson Notice of Compliance - D. E. 9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Simms, Graham)
June 7, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE by Darah Lyn Eckert re #9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Browning, Robert)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Mr. Sprayberry is ORDERED to file any response to these motions by June 30, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 6/7/2022. (ch, )
June 6, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mancel Sprayberry. (nkl, )
May 11, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss D.E. 1 by Darah Lyn Eckert. (Browning, Robert) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/12/2022: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ).
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mancel Sprayberry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/10/2022. (nkl, )
May 10, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Roger W Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Simms, Graham)
April 19, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Roger W Anderson, Darah Lyn Eckert. (ch, )
April 19, 2022 (MAILED) In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
April 18, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mancel Sprayberry. (ch, ) Modified on 4/19/2022 (ch, ).
April 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roger W Anderson, Darah Lyn Eckert, filed by Mancel Sprayberry.(ch, ) Modified on 4/19/2022 (ch, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprayberry v. Anderson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mancel Sprayberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger W Anderson
Represented By: Graham Kirkland Simms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darah Lyn Eckert
Represented By: Robert Myrick Browning, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?