NorthStar Systems LLC v. MediaTek Inc.
| NorthStar Systems LLC |
| MediaTek Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00135 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Issuance of Letters Rogatory. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/28/2022. (ch, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for Service of Process on Defendant MediaTek Inc. by NorthStar Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Kurt Truelove on behalf of NorthStar Systems LLC (Truelove, Justin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to MediaTek Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Peter Lambrianakos on behalf of NorthStar Systems LLC (Lambrianakos, Peter) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of NorthStar Systems LLC (Fabricant, Alfred) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Vincent J Rubino, III on behalf of NorthStar Systems LLC (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by NorthStar Systems LLC identifying Corporate Parent Alpha Alpha Intellectual Partners LLC for NorthStar Systems LLC. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rubino, Vincent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against MediaTek Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8902948.), filed by NorthStar Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rubino, Vincent) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NorthStar Systems LLC v. MediaTek Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NorthStar Systems LLC | |
| Represented By: | Alfred Ross Fabricant |
| Represented By: | Peter Lambrianakos |
| Represented By: | Vincent J Rubino, III |
| Represented By: | Justin Kurt Truelove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MediaTek Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
