InnoBrilliance, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. et al
Plaintiff: InnoBrilliance, LLC
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: AT&T Inc.
Counter Claimant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv00145
Filed: May 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2023 Filing 28 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ch, )
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting #26 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES that all claims and causes of action asserted by Plaintiff against Defendants in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/6/2023. (ch, )
January 5, 2023 Filing 26 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by InnoBrilliance, LLC (Kula, Kenneth)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Joint MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF ALL DEADLINES. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 12/2/2022. (ch, )
December 1, 2022 Filing 24 Joint MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF ALL DEADLINES by LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
November 11, 2022 NOTICE of CANCELLATION of Hearing: Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2022 10:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap has been CANCELLED. (aeb)
November 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER - ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall DECONSOLIDATE Case No. 2:22-cv-00288 from Case No. 2:22-cv-145. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/10/2022. (ch, )
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting #21 Motion to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/1/2022. (ch, )
October 31, 2022 Filing 21 Joint MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement by LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
October 28, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Sloane Sueanne Kyrazis on behalf of AT&T Services, Inc. (Kyrazis, Sloane)
October 28, 2022 Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by David S Frist on behalf of AT&T Services, Inc. (Frist, David)
October 28, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Theodore Stevenson, III on behalf of AT&T Services, Inc. (Stevenson, Theodore)
October 28, 2022 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by AT&T Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent AT&T Inc. for AT&T Services, Inc.. (Stevenson, Theodore)
October 28, 2022 Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against InnoBrilliance, LLC by AT&T Services, Inc..(Stevenson, Theodore)
October 28, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2022 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/21/2022. (ch, )
October 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CONSOLIDATION ORDER. The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:22-cv 00145. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 10/14/2022. (slo, )
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #12 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/20/2022. (ch, )
September 19, 2022 Filing 12 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
September 19, 2022 Filing 11 ***FILED IN ERROR***Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) Modified on 9/19/2022 (ch, ).
September 19, 2022 ***FILED IN ERROR. PER ATTORNEY Document # 11, Motion for Extension of Time. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. answer due 10/7/2022; LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. answer due 10/7/2022.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 6/8/2022. (ch, )
June 7, 2022 Filing 9 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND WAIVER OF FOREIGN SERVICE REQUIREMENT by LG ELECTRONICS, INC., LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
June 7, 2022 ***FILED IN ERROR. Document # 8, Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, )
June 3, 2022 Filing 8 ***FILED IN ERROR***Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement by InnoBrilliance, LLC. (Kula, Kenneth) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2022: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (nkl, ). Modified on 6/7/2022 (ch, ).
May 24, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by InnoBrilliance, LLC. LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. served on 5/19/2022, answer due 6/9/2022. (Joe, Christopher)
May 13, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc. through its registered agent United States Corporation Co. (nkl, )
May 12, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to LG ELECTRONICS, INC.. (nkl, )
May 12, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kenneth Paul Kula on behalf of InnoBrilliance, LLC (Kula, Kenneth)
May 12, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Michael Joe on behalf of InnoBrilliance, LLC (Joe, Christopher)
May 12, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Joe, Christopher)
May 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8913586.), filed by InnoBrilliance, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Claim Chart, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - '299 Patent, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Joe, Christopher)
May 12, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )
May 12, 2022 Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (nkl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: InnoBrilliance, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: InnoBrilliance, LLC
Represented By: Kenneth Paul Kula
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG ELECTRONICS, INC.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LG Electronics U.S.A. Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Consolidated defendant: AT&T Inc.
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Represented By: Christopher Michael Joe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Represented By: Theodore Stevenson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?