Xueshan Technologies Inc. v. Renesas Electronics, Inc.
Plaintiff: Xueshan Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Renesas Electronics, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv00157
Filed: May 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Renesas Electronics, Inc. answer due 8/16/2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/25/2022. (ch, )
May 19, 2022 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Xueshan Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Nelson, Edward)
May 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Louis Levenson on behalf of Xueshan Technologies Inc. (Levenson, Nathan)
May 17, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Hart Rastegar on behalf of Xueshan Technologies Inc. (Rastegar, Jonathan)
May 17, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan P Griffin on behalf of Xueshan Technologies Inc. (Griffin, Ryan)
May 17, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to Renesas Electronics, Inc.. (ch, )
May 17, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Xueshan Technologies Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Wi-Lan Technologies, Inc. for Xueshan Technologies Inc.. (Nelson, Edward)
May 17, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Nelson, Edward)
May 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement against Renesas Electronics, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8926321.), filed by Xueshan Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nelson, Edward)
May 17, 2022 Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )
May 17, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Xueshan Technologies Inc. v. Renesas Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Xueshan Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Hart Rastegar
Represented By: Nathan Louis Levenson
Represented By: Ryan P Griffin
Represented By: Edward R Nelson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Renesas Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?