TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Best Buy Co., Inc.
| TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00179 |
| May 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jason E Mueller on behalf of Best Buy Co., Inc. (Mueller, Jason) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Best Buy Co., Inc. to 7/28/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 8 Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc.'s Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC..(Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. Best Buy Co., Inc. served on 6/7/2022, answer due 6/28/2022. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Best Buy Co., Inc.. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian J Hurt on behalf of TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
| Filing 2 Additional Attachments to Main Document: #1 Complaint,.. (Davis, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Best Buy Co., Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-8947165.), filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - '729 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - '414 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - '224 Patent)(Davis, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Christian J Hurt |
| Represented By: | William Ellsworth Davis, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Best Buy Co., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jason E Mueller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
