S3G Technology LLC v. QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip)
Plaintiff: S3G Technology LLC
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip)
Case Number: 2:2022cv00196
Filed: June 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Referring Judge: Roy S Payne
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2022 Filing 9 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (nkl, )
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/27/2022. (nkl, )
July 25, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by S3G Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Charles)
June 24, 2022 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by S3G Technology LLC.( Ainsworth, Charles)
June 24, 2022 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip) to 7/29/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
June 13, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by S3G Technology LLC. QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip) served on 6/9/2022, answer due 6/30/2022. (Ainsworth, Charles)
June 9, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip). (ch, )
June 9, 2022 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by S3G Technology LLC (Ainsworth, Charles)
June 9, 2022 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Ainsworth, Charles)
June 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip) ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXEDC-8965838.), filed by S3G Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Ainsworth, Charles)
June 9, 2022 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, )
June 9, 2022 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: S3G Technology LLC v. QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S3G Technology LLC
Represented By: Charles Ainsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QuikTrip Corporation (dba QuikTrip)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?