Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC v. Kohl's Corporation et al
| Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC |
| Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00271 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's, Inc. (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 12 FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. PLEASE IGNORE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's, Inc. (Henry, Claire) Modified on 9/16/2022 (klc, ). |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #4 Complaint by Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's, Inc..(Henry, Claire) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kohl's, Inc..( Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kohl's Corporation.( Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kohl's, Inc..( Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Kohl's Corporation.( Henry, Claire) |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kohl's, Inc.. 4 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kohl's, Inc. to 9/15/2022. 4 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kohl's Corporation to 9/15/2022. 1 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kohl's Corporation to 9/14/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Kohl's, Inc. to 9/11/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es))(ch, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Kohl's Corporation, Kohl's, Inc., filed by Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(ch, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan R Miller on behalf of Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC (Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (McDonough, James) |
| Filing 1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC (McDonough, James) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
