Lionra Technologies Limited v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
| Lionra Technologies Limited |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., |
| 2:2022cv00305 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Randy Yim on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Yim, Jonathan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Drew Bennett Hollander on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Hollander, Drew) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth Raymond Hasenour on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Hasenour, Seth) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brett E Cooper on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Cooper, Brett) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Neil Alan Rubin on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Rubin, Neil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc A Fenster on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Fenster, Marc) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,.( Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,.( Smith, Melissa) |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., to 10/15/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., to 9/30/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew D Weiss on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Weiss, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Kroeger, Paul) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lionra Technologies Limited. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., served on 8/10/2022, answer due 8/31/2022. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued as to CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Lionra Technologies Limited (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9059288.), filed by Lionra Technologies Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
