NextGen Innovations, LLC v. Infinera Corporation
| NextGen Innovations, LLC |
| Infinera Corporation |
| 2:2022cv00306 |
| August 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint on behalf of Infinera Corporation.(Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint on behalf of Infinera Corporation.(Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 11 ***FILED IN ERROR***Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint on behalf of Infinera Corporation.(Henry, Claire) Modified on 8/31/2022 (ch, ). |
| Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Infinera Corporation to 10/18/2022. 12 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| ***FILED IN ERROR. FIRST APPLICATION CAN'T BE FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS Document # 11, Unopposed Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (ch, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Infinera Corporation to 10/6/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of NextGen Innovations, LLC (Henry, Claire) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of NextGen Innovations, LLC (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NextGen Innovations, LLC. Infinera Corporation served on 8/16/2022, answer due 9/6/2022. (Wang, Benjamin) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Infinera Corporation c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of NextGen Innovations, LLC (Kroeger, Paul) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew D Weiss on behalf of NextGen Innovations, LLC (Weiss, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Irene Y Lee on behalf of NextGen Innovations, LLC (Lee, Irene) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by NextGen Innovations, LLC (Wang, Benjamin) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Wang, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Infinera Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9060626.), filed by NextGen Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wang, Benjamin) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
