Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al
Plaintiff: Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Defendant: Taasera Licensing LLC and Quest Patent Research Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv00314
Filed: August 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 83 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Justin Kurt Truelove on behalf of Quest Patent Research Corporation (Truelove, Justin)
September 27, 2022 NOTICE of Hearing: In-person Scheduling Conference set for 10/11/2022 01:00 PM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (aeb)
August 17, 2022 Filing 82 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:22-cv-02306. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
August 16, 2022 Filing 81 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - Eastern District of Texas. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/4/2022) (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
August 16, 2022 MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - Eastern District of Texas (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 26, 2022 Filing 80 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 6/16/2022 before Judge Edgardo Ramos. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Patricia Nilsen, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 8/16/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/26/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/24/2022..(McGuirk, Kelly) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER: granting #75 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its reply in support of its motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/22/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER: granting #70 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its reply in support of its motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/22/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 77 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Quest Patent Research Corporation. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #75 .(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 76 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (REDACTED). Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 75 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated July 21, 2022. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 74 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument on PAN's Cross-Motion for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery [ECF 59], and Motions to Dismiss Filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation [ECF 48] and Taasera Licensing LLC [ECF 54] addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Krishnan Padmanabhan dated July 21, 2022. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 73 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #59 CROSS MOTION for Discovery (for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery). . Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Google Search for "Taasera and Plano").(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 72 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Taasera Licensing LLC. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #70 .(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 71 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (REDACTED). Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 21, 2022 Filing 70 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated July 21, 2022. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 14, 2022 Filing 69 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Scahill NY Attorney Registration, #2 Exhibit B - Fabricant Firm Contact Info, #3 Exhibit C - Taasera Licensing LLC, #4 Exhibit D - Photo of Truelove Law Firm 1, #5 Exhibit E - Photo of Truelove Law Firm 2, #6 Exhibit F - Truelove Law Firm Address, #7 Exhibit G - MDL Dkt. 28-9, #8 Exhibit H - Taaseratrust.com draft, #9 Exhibit I - Taaseratrust.com).(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 14, 2022 Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Scahill NY Attorney Registration, #2 Exhibit B - Fabricant Firm Contact Info, #3 Exhibit C - MDL 3042, Dkt. 28-9, #4 Exhibit D - James Doyle LinkedIn).(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 14, 2022 Filing 67 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #59 CROSS MOTION for Discovery (for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery). . Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER granting #65 Motion for Joseph Michael Mercadante to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Edgardo Ramos)(Text Only Order) (jar) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
July 1, 2022 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #65 MOTION for Joseph Michael Mercadante to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (vba) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 30, 2022 Filing 65 MOTION for Joseph Michael Mercadante to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Joseph M. Mercadante ISO Motion for Pro Hac Vice with Certificates, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice of J. Mercadante).(Mercadante, Joseph) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: denying #61 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #61 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim., #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s request for a stay of its opposition to the defendants' motions to dismiss pending jurisdictional discovery is DENIED. The parties are instructed to follow the briefing schedule directed by the Court during the pre-motion conference held on June 16, 2022: motions due 6/23/2022; responses due 7/14/2022; replies due 7/21/2022. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/24/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER: granting #53 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its motion to dismiss, supporting memorandum of law, and supporting declaration is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/24/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER: granting #47 Letter Motion to Seal. The defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's request for permission to file under seal an unredacted version of its motion to dismiss, supporting memorandum of law, and supporting declaration is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/24/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 24, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines: Responses due by 7/14/2022 Replies due by 7/21/2022. (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 61 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim., #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (For Stay of Opposition Date Pending Jurisdictional Discovery) addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Krishnan Padmanabhan dated June 23, 2022. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 60 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #59 CROSS MOTION for Discovery (for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery). . Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J).(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 59 CROSS MOTION for Discovery (for Leave to Take Jurisdictional Discovery). Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 58 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DECLARATION of Tim Scahill in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Quest Patent Research Corporation. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #53 .(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 57 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Quest Patent Research Corporation. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #53 .(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 56 DECLARATION of Tim Scahill in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 55 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Complaint for Patent Infringement, #2 Exhibit 2 Affidavit of Service, #3 Exhibit 3 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #4 Exhibit 4 Order Dismissing Case).(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 53 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Motion to Dismiss and Declaration addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated June 23, 2022. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 52 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DECLARATION of Jon C. Scahill in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Taasera Licensing LLC. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #47 .(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 51 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Taasera Licensing LLC. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #47 .(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 50 DECLARATION of Jon C. Scahill in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 49 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (REDACTED). Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4).(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 48 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 23, 2022 Filing 47 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Motion to Dismiss and Declaration addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated June 23, 2022. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 16, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edgardo Ramos: Pre-Motion Conference held on 6/16/2022 by telephone. Plaintiff's and Defendants' counsel present. Quest Patent Research Corporation and Taasera Licensing LLC are granted leave to file their motions to dismiss on the following briefing schedule: motions due June 23, 2022; responses due July 14, 2022; replies due July 21, 2022. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. may, if it wishes, move for jurisdictional discovery, on the same schedule. (jar) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #39 Letter filed by Taasera Licensing LLC. ENDORSEMENT: Taasera's application will be heard at the June 16, pre-motion conference. SO ORDERED., ( Telephonic Pre-Motion Conference set for 6/16/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/08/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER granting #41 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. A pre-motion conference will be held on June 16, 2022 at 10:30 a.m. by telephone. The parties are instructed to call (877) 411-9748 and enter access code 3029857# when prompted. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Edgardo Ramos)(Text Only Order) (jar) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 6, 2022 Filing 44 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Krishnan Padmanabhan dated June 6, 2022 re: #41 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complsint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated June 1, 2022. . Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 3, 2022 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #43 MOTION for Joseph Michael Mercadante to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26231689. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of NJ;. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (sgz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 2, 2022 Filing 43 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Joseph Michael Mercadante to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26231689. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Joseph M. Mercadante ISO Motion for Pro Hac Vice with Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mercadante).(Mercadante, Joseph) Modified on 6/3/2022 (sgz). [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting #40 Motion for Kelly C. Hunsaker to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Edgardo Ramos)(Text Only Order) (jar) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 2, 2022 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #40 MOTION for Kelly C. Hunsaker to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26224608. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sgz) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Filing 41 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complsint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated June 1, 2022. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Filing 40 MOTION for Kelly C. Hunsaker to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-26224608. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of Kelly C. Hunsaker ISO Motion for Pro Hac Vice With Certificate, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Pro Hac Vice - Hunsaker).(Hunsaker, Kelly) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Filing 39 LETTER addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated June 1, 2022 re: Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #32 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's motion to dismiss, Doc. 32, is denied without prejudice. Defendant is directed to file a letter requesting a pre-motion conference in connection with its motion to dismisspursuant to the Court's Individual Practices. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/1/22) (yv) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
June 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER denying without prejudice #25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. ENDORSEMENT: Defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's motion to dismiss, Doc. 25, is denied without prejudice. Defendant is directed to file a letter requesting a pre-motion conference in connection with its motion to dismiss pursuant to the Court's Individual Practices. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/1/22) (yv) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 36 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DECLARATION of Tim Scahill in Support re: #32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Quest Patent Research Corporation. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #31 .(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 35 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Quest Patent Research Corporation. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #31 .(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 34 DECLARATION of Tim Scahill in Support re: #32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (REDACTED). Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4).(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 32 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 31 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Motion to Dismiss and Declaration addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated May 31, 2022. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 30 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Quest Patent Research Corporation for Taasera Licensing LLC. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 29 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DECLARATION of Jon C. Scahill in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Taasera Licensing LLC. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #24 .(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 28 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. . Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation, Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Taasera Licensing LLC. Motion or Order to File Under Seal: #24 .(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 27 DECLARATION of Jon C. Scahill in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Redacted). Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4).(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , Or in the Alternative, to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 24 LETTER MOTION to Seal Unredacted Version of Motion to Dismiss and Declaration addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated May 31, 2022. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 31, 2022 Filing 23 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 14, 2022 Filing 22 EXHIBIT TO PLEADING re: #21 Amended Complaint,,,. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 14, 2022 Filing 21 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Quest Patent Research Corporation, Taasera Licensing LLC with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. Related document: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US6842796, #2 Exhibit B - US7673137, #3 Exhibit C - US8127356, #4 Exhibit D - US8327441, #5 Exhibit E - US8850517, #6 Exhibit F - US8955038, #7 Exhibit G - US8990948, #8 Exhibit H - US9092616, #9 Exhibit I - US9923918, #10 Exhibit J - EDTX Complaint Signature Page, #11 Exhibit K - TX Certificate of Formation for Taasera, #12 Exhibit L - Quest 10K Dec 31, 2021 Excerpts, #13 Exhibit M - Assignment Record, #14 Exhibit N - Tessera-Quest Website Pages).(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 13, 2022 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Krishnan Padmanabhan to RE-FILE re: Document No. #19 Amended Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong party/parties whom the pleading is against were selected; the pleading is amended more than 21 days after service of the original pleading; Court's leave has not been granted. Re-file the pleading using the event type Amended Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. File the Exhibit to Pleading event found under the event list Other Documents and attach either opposing party's written consent or Court's leave. (vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 12, 2022 Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Rueckheim on behalf of Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Rueckheim, Michael) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 12, 2022 Filing 19 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FRCP RULE 15 NON-COMPLIANCE - FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Palo Alto Networks, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. Related document: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - US6842796, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - US7673137, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - US8127356, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - US8327441, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - US8850517, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - US8955038, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - US8990948, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H - US9092616, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I - US9923918, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J - EDTX Complaint Signature Page, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K - TX Certificate of Formation for Taasera, #12 Exhibit Exhibit L - Quest 10K Dec 31, 2021 Excerpts, #13 Exhibit Exhibit M - Assignment Record, #14 Exhibit Exhibit N - Tessera-Quest Website Pages).(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) Modified on 5/13/2022 (vf). [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
May 12, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Krishnan Padmanabhan on behalf of Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Padmanabhan, Krishnan) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: granting #15 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #15 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated April 12, 2022. The defendant Taasera Licensing LLC's request for a 30-day extension of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 16, 2022 is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Taasera Licensing LLC answer due 5/16/2022. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/12/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: granting #14 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint. addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated April 12, 2022. The defendant Quest Patent Research Corporation's request for a 30-day extension of the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 13, 2022 is GRANTED. It is SO ORDERED. Quest Patent Research Corporation answer due 5/13/2022. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/12/2022) (ama) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Filing 15 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Alfred R. Fabricant dated April 12, 2022. Document filed by Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Filing 14 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Mark J. Rosenberg dated April 12, 2022. Document filed by Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mark Jon Rosenberg on behalf of Quest Patent Research Corporation..(Rosenberg, Mark) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 12, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alfred Ross Fabricant on behalf of Taasera Licensing LLC..(Fabricant, Alfred) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
April 4, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Taasera Licensing LLC served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. Service was accepted by Suzanne Phillips. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 24, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Quest Patent Research Corporation served on 3/23/2022, answer due 4/13/2022. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Filing 9 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Filing 8 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Quest Patent Research Corporation. (vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Taasera Licensing LLC. (vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 23, 2022 Case Designated ECF. (vf) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 22, 2022 Filing 5 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 22, 2022 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Quest Patent Research Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 22, 2022 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Taasera Licensing LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 22, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]
March 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Quest Patent Research Corporation, Taasera Licensing LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-25895113)Document filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc...(Radsch, Andrew) [Transferred from New York Southern on 8/17/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Taasera Licensing LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Represented By: Kelly Hunsaker
Represented By: Michael Rueckheim
Represented By: Andrew Townsend Radsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taasera Licensing LLC
Represented By: Alfred Ross Fabricant
Represented By: Joseph M Mercadante
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quest Patent Research Corporation
Represented By: Justin Kurt Truelove
Represented By: Mark Jon Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?