Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc.
Lionra Technologies Limited |
Fortinet, Inc. |
2:2022cv00322 |
August 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Randy Yim on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Yim, Jonathan) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Drew Bennett Hollander on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Hollander, Drew) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Seth Raymond Hasenour on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Hasenour, Seth) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 9/13/2022. (nkl, ) |
Answer Due Deadline Updated for Fortinet, Inc. to 10/28/2022. (nkl, ) |
Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Lionra Technologies Limited. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cooper, Brett) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Brett E Cooper on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Cooper, Brett) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lionra Technologies Limited. Fortinet, Inc. served on 8/23/2022, answer due 9/13/2022. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew D Weiss on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Weiss, Andrew) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Paul Anthony Kroeger on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Kroeger, Paul) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Ma on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Ma, Jonathan) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Neil Alan Rubin on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Rubin, Neil) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Marc A Fenster on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Fenster, Marc) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued as to Fortinet, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company dba CSC Lawyers Incorporating Service Company. (nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Lionra Technologies Limited. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Designation of Attorney in Charge to Reza Mirzaie on behalf of Lionra Technologies Limited (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Lionra Technologies Limited Notice of Related Cases (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Lionra Technologies Limited (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Mirzaie, Reza) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fortinet, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9080942.), filed by Lionra Technologies Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mirzaie, Reza) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.