Ridgeview IP LLC v. Anthology Inc.
| Ridgeview IP LLC |
| Anthology Inc. |
| 2:2022cv00375 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Roy S Payne |
| Robert W Schroeder |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120) at termination of case. AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ch, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Court ACCEPTS AND ACKNOWLEDGES, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), all pending claims and causes of action in the above-captioned case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 11/8/2022. (ch, )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Ridgeview IP LLC (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 Defendant Anthology, Inc's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint (Nadel, Michael) |
| Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Anthology Inc. to 11/25/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ridgeview IP LLC. Anthology Inc. served on 10/4/2022, answer due 10/25/2022. (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael S Nadel on behalf of Anthology Inc. (Nadel, Michael) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued as to Anthology Inc.. (ch, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Honea, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anthology Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9151325.), filed by Ridgeview IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Honea, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ridgeview IP LLC v. Anthology Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ridgeview IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christopher A Honea |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Anthology Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael S Nadel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
