TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. The Kroger Co.,
TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. |
The Kroger Co., |
2:2022cv00491 |
December 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:22-cv-00490. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Individual cases remain active for trial., Cases associated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 2/6/2023. (nkl, ) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re The Kroger Co.,.( Atkins, William) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by William P Atkins on behalf of The Kroger Co., (Atkins, William) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for The Kroger Co., to 3/13/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to The Kroger Co.,. (ch, ) |
Filing 4 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Hurt, Christian) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christian J Hurt on behalf of TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Hurt, Christian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Original Complaint for Patent Infringement against The Kroger Co., ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9283398.), filed by TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - '729 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - '414 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - '224 Patent, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Davis, William) |
Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. The Kroger Co., | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TIARE TECHNOLOGY, INC. | |
Represented By: | Christian J Hurt |
Represented By: | William Ellsworth Davis, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Kroger Co., | |
Represented By: | Pillsbury Winthrop |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.