STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
| STA Group LLC |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00030 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Motorola Solutions, Inc. to 4/7/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Motorola Solutions, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Patrick Duffy Richards on behalf of STA Group LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9341171. (Richards, Patrick) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by James A Shimota on behalf of STA Group LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9340906. (Shimota, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Janjeera Suzanne Hail on behalf of STA Group LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9340855. (Hail, Janjeera) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice by Brenna K Legaard on behalf of STA Group LLC. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number ATXEDC-9340764. (Legaard, Brenna) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by STA Group LLC. Motorola Solutions, Inc. served on 1/30/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to Motorola Solutions, Inc. c/o CT Corp System. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Wesley Hill on behalf of STA Group LLC (Hill, Jack Wesley) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by STA Group LLC (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by STA Group LLC. (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fair, Andrea) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Motorola Solutions, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9328925.), filed by STA Group LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H)(Fair, Andrea) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
