Authentixx LLC v. UMB Financial Corporation
Authentixx LLC |
UMB Financial Corporation |
2:2023cv00057 |
February 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Roy S Payne |
Robert W Schroeder |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Authentixx LLC (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re UMB Financial Corporation.( Turner, Colin) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for UMB Financial Corporation to 4/28/2023. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re UMB Financial Corporation.( Turner, Colin) |
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for UMB Financial Corporation to 4/13/2023. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Filing 5 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Authentixx LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Isaac Phillip Rabicoff on behalf of Authentixx LLC (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against UMB Financial Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9357792.), filed by Authentixx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 1 SUMMONS Issued as to UMB Financial Corporation. (nkl, ) |
Case assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Authentixx LLC v. UMB Financial Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Authentixx LLC | |
Represented By: | Isaac Phillip Rabicoff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UMB Financial Corporation | |
Represented By: | Colin Webster Turner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.