Dialect, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Plaintiff: Dialect, LLC
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Case Number: 2:2023cv00061
Filed: February 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2023 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )
February 21, 2023 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
February 17, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Dialect, LLC (Fair, Andrea)
February 17, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Claire Abernathy Henry on behalf of Dialect, LLC (Henry, Claire)
February 17, 2023 Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dialect, LLC. (Everingham, Charles)
February 17, 2023 Filing 3 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Everingham, Charles)
February 17, 2023 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dialect, LLC identifying Corporate Parent None for Dialect, LLC. (Everingham, Charles)
February 17, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9363243.), filed by Dialect, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 7,398,209, #3 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Patent No. 7,502,738, #4 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 7,917,367, #5 Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 8,140,327, #6 Exhibit 5 - U.S. Patent No. 8,195,468, #7 Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 8,447,607, #8 Exhibit 7 - U.S. Patent No. 8,849,652, #9 Exhibit 8 - U.S. Patent No. 9,495,957, #10 Exhibit 9 - U.S. Patent No. 9,734,825)(Everingham, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dialect, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dialect, LLC
Represented By: Andrea Leigh Fair
Represented By: Claire Abernathy Henry
Represented By: Charles Everingham, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?