Haskins v 10 Roads Express LLC
| 10 Roads Express LLC |
| Diane Haskins |
| 2:2023cv00071 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Rodney Gilstrap |
| Roy S Payne |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Cooper, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by M Raymond Hatcher, II on behalf of Diane Haskins (Hatcher, M) |
Filing 6
NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, PROPOSED DEADLINES FOR DOCKET CONTROL ORDER AND DISCOVERY ORDER - Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 5/15/2023 10:40 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 4/3/2023. (ch, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Diane Haskins (Cooper, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by 10 Roads Express LLC.(Zopolsky, Joseph) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued as to 10 Roads Express LLC. (ch, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Plaintiff's Original Complaint) against 10 Roads Express LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9371466.), filed by Diane Haskins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Cooper, Nathan) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (ch, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haskins v 10 Roads Express LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 10 Roads Express LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joseph D. Zopolsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Claimant: Diane Haskins | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Eric Cooper |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
