Cardtek International, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
Cardtek International, Inc. |
Starbucks Corporation |
2:2023cv00217 |
May 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Rodney Gilstrap |
Roy S Payne |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #3 Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by Cardtek International, Inc..(Johnson, Logan) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrew Hensley on behalf of Starbucks Corporation (Hensley, Andrew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kyle A. Ceuninck on behalf of Starbucks Corporation (Ceuninck, Kyle) |
Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Starbucks Corporation (Miller, Richard) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Amended Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Starbucks Corporation by Starbucks Corporation.(Miller, Richard) |
Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Starbucks Corporation, filed by Cardtek International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 1 ORDER - ORDERED- The above-captioned case is hereby severed, with The Kroger Co. remaining as the defendant in this action, and the Clerk opening a new civil action for Starbucks Corporation, which shall be consolidated with this action for pretrial purposes. A copy of this Order shall be the first filing in the new action. Cardtek International, Inc. shall file in their respective actions the amended complaints contained within its motion for severance within (7) days of this order. The order setting the case for scheduling conference (Dkt. No. 12) is hereby vacated. (CASE WAS SEVERED FROM 2:23-CV-45). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 5/12/2023. (ch, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.